Massage, laser and shockwave therapy improve pain and scar pruritus after burns: a systematic review.

QUESTIONS: In adults with a burn injury, do non-invasive therapies improve pain and burn scar pruritus, elasticity and vascularisation? Are any effects maintained beyond the intervention period? DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with burn scars. INTERVENTION: The experimental intervention was a non-invasive (ie, non-surgical or non-pharmacological) therapy applied to the burn scar. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, pruritus intensity, elasticity and vascularisation. RESULTS: Fifteen trials involving 780 participants were included. The results indicated a beneficial effect on pain intensity on a 0-to-10 scale after massage (MD -1.5, 95% CI -1.8 to -1.1), shockwave therapy (MD -0.8, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4) and laser (MD -4.0, 95% CI -6.0 to -2.0). The results indicated a beneficial effect on pruritus intensity on a 0-to-10 scale after massage (MD -0.4, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.2), shockwave therapy (MD -1.3, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.3) and laser (MD -4.8, 95% CI -6.1 to -3.5). Massage, shockwave therapy and silicone produced negligible or unclear benefits on scar elasticity and vascularisation. The quality of evidence varied from low to moderate. CONCLUSION: Among all commonly used non-invasive therapies for the treatment of burn scars, low-to-moderate quality evidence indicated that massage, laser and shockwave therapy reduce pain and the intensity of scar pruritus. Low-to-moderate quality evidence suggested that massage, shockwave therapy and silicone have negligible or unclear effects for improving scar elasticity and vascularisation. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021258336).

Efficacy of Massage Techniques for Hypertrophic Burn Scars - A Systematic Review of Literature.

Despite advancements in burn care, evidence estimates that pathological scarring occurs in 32%-75% of cutaneous burns. Scar massage therapy is an under researched method of management for hypertrophic burn scars which has scope to be a low-cost treatment alternative. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of scar massage techniques for common hypertrophic burn scar symptoms such as contraction, pruritus, pain and visibility. The keywords and corresponding MeSH terms were inputed into PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews, University Library of Hull, York and Queen Mary, University of London. Following the implementation of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, ten papers were included for data extraction. Quality assessment of all papers was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and ROBINS-I tool. Data pertaining to the nature of the participant demographics, scar massage treatment, and study outcomes was extracted. Nine of the ten studies showed a significant improvement for scar massage treatment of hypertrophic burn scar symptoms despite using different massage techniques. Friction and oscillation massage was used in partnership to improve scar function, whereas effleurage and petrissage used in longer sessions was seen to improve scar visibility and pain. Scar pruritus was improved by each massage technique. Scar massage has been shown to be effective at improving scar outcomes. This paper suggests massage techniques should be tailored to the patients' symptoms. A large, randomized control trial is required to advance this area of research.

The mechanism of Semen Persicae-Flos Carthami in treating hypertrophic scar: A study based on network pharmacological analysis and in vitro experiments.

Traditional medicine believes that hypertrophic scar (HS) falls into the category of "blood stasis". Chinese herbs for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis, activating meridians, and relieving pain are usually selected to treat HS by traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Both Semen Persicae (SP) and Flos Carthami (FC) are confirmed to be effective for HS. Clinically, SP and FC are often used in combination with each other. However, the pharmacodynamic mechanism and molecular target of SP-FC in the treatment of HS are still unclear. Therefore, this study is intended to explore the mechanism and target of SP-FC in the treatment of HS through network pharmacology combined with in vitro cell and molecular biology experiments. Target genes of SP-FC were obtained from the traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform (TCMSP), and targets of HS-related diseases were searched from databases such as Disgenet and GeneCards. Based on the targets searched and obtained, a Venn diagram was plotted to acquire common targets of SP-FC-HS. Next, STRING 11.0 was employed for protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of common targets; and cytoscape 3.9.0 for connection relationship analysis of PPI and plotting of a "drug-component-target" network diagram. Besides, a modified explant culture method was applied to separate primary hypertrophic scar fibroblasts (HSFs); MTT assay to detect cell viability of HSFs after treatment by SP-FC for 24 h; Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining combined with flow cytometry to test apoptosis; western blot to check the protein expression level of p53; and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR to determine mRNA level of p53. In the analysis of network pharmacology, 269 pharmacological targets of SP, 449 pharmacological targets of FC, and 2569 targets of HS-related diseases were screened from the databases. After plotting the Venn diagram, 116 common targets of SP-FC-HS were acquired. In vitro experiments showed that the expression of p53 in HSFs was decreased. SP-FC significantly reduces the viability of HSFs, increases p53 levels in HSFs, and promotes apoptosis. SP-FC can reduce scar formation by promoting p53 expression.

The effects of Shikonin on the hypertrophic scar of rabbit ears via the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway.

As a traditional Chinese medicine, Zihuang Shengji Ointment has obvious effects on promoting postoperative wound healing and reducing scar formation in clinical application. Shikonin is the major phytochemical in Zihuang Shengji Ointment. As a kind of naphquinone compound with anti-tumor, anti-viral, anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial and other biological activities extracted from Lithospermum erythrorhizon, shikonin exerts an important role in many diseases. Shikonin has impacts on the development of hypertrophic scars (HS), however, these effects are yet mostly unknown. As a result, we created the Newland white rabbit ear HS model, administered shikonin to it, and then assessed scar hypertrophy using HE and VG staining. The degree of scarring is assessed by HI, NA, as well as AA. The expression levels of collagen I, collagen III, as well as α-SMA as well as fibroblast proliferation, are also measured using real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry, and western blot. TUNEL tests are used to assess fibroblast apoptosis. In our work, HE staining and VG staining showed that the shikonin-treated group had normal bundles of collagen fibers and regular fibroblasts. Shikonin suppresses the production of HS, according to histopathological features, HI, NA, and AA measures. Shikonin also causes fibroblast apoptosis and lowers the production of α-SMA, collagen I, as well as collagen III in the HS rat. Notably, we discover that NF-κB activation and TLR4 activity are inhibited by shikonin. Overall, the results show that the signaling pathway of TLR4/NF-κB is modulated by shikonin's inhibitory effect on scar formation, which represses the levels of collagen I, collagen III, α-SMA, as well as fibroblasts.

[A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of compound analgesia in ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment of post-burn hypertrophic scars in children].

Objective: To investigate the effects of compound analgesia on ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser (UFCL) treatment of post-burn hypertrophic s in children. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From April 2018 to March 2020, 169 pediatric patients with post-burn hypertrophic s admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University were randomly divided into general anesthesia alone group (39 cases, 19 males and 20 females, aged 35 (21, 48) months), general anesthesia+lidocaine group (41 cases, 23 males and 18 females, aged 42 (22, 68) months), general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (41 cases, 25 males and 16 females, aged 38 (26, 52) months), and three-drug combination group with general anesthesia + lidocaine+ibuprofen suppository (48 cases, 25 males and 23 females, aged 42 (25, 60) months), and the pediatric patients in each group were treated with corresponding analgesic regimens when UFCL was used to treat s, and the pediatric patients were given comprehensive care throughout the treatment process. The pain degree of pediatric patients scar was evaluated by facial expression,legs,activity,cry,and consolability (FLACC) of children's pain behavior scale at 0 (immediately), 1, 2, and 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, respectively. At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia of postoperative pain assessment, the self-made analgesia satisfaction questionnaire was used to evaluate the satisfaction for the analgesic effect of the pediatric patients or their families, and the satisfaction rate was calculated. Within 2 h after the first operation, the occurrences of adverse reactions of the pediatric patients, such as nausea and vomiting, headache, dizziness, drowsiness, etc, were observed and recorded. Before the first treatment and 1 month after the last treatment, the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) was used to evaluate the pediatric patients scar, and the difference value between the two was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with least significant difference test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact probability test. Results: At 0 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of pediatric patients in general anesthesia+lidocaine group, general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group (P<0.01). The FLACC scores of the pediatric patients in anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01), and the FLACC score of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (P<0.01). At 1 and 2 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of pediatric patients in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were both significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group and general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01), and the FLACC score of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (P<0.01). At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of the pediatric patients in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group and general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01). At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the satisfactions rate with the analgesic effect in the four groups of pediatric patients or their families were 79.49% (31/39), 85.37% (35/41), 87.80% (36/41), and 97.92% (47/48), respectively. The satisfaction rate of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly higher than those in general anesthesia alone group, general anesthesia+lidocaine group, general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group. Within 2 h after the first operation, there was no significant difference in the overall comparison of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, headache, dizziness, and drowsiness of pediatric patients among the 4 groups (P>0.05). The VSS scores of pediatric patients before the first treatment, 1 month after the last treatment, and and the difference value between the two in the 4 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusions: Three-drug combination for analgesia has a good effect in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burn in pediatric patients with UFCL. Pediatric patients or their families are highly satisfied with the effect, and the treatment effect and incidence of adverse reactions are similar to other analgesic regimens, so it is recommended to be promoted in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of laser combination therapy and laser alone therapy for keloid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser alone therapy and laser combination therapy (mainly combined with other kinds of laser or steroids) for keloid.PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles from inception to June 2020. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software 2.0 (CMA) was used to perform the meta-analysis.A total of 29 articles were included in this meta-analysis. During the mean follow-up of 14 (1-84) months, the overall improvement rates of baseline Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score and itch were 0.454 (95%CI 0.351-0.561, I2 = 0) and 0.786 (95%CI 0.613-0.895, I2 = 0) in the laser combination therapy group. The improvement rates of scar height and flexibility in the laser combination therapy group were 0.629 (95%CI 0.519-0.727, I2 = 52.089) and 0.784 (95%CI 0.251-0.975, I2 = 89.420). The average improvement rate of the scar score in laser combination therapy was 0.338 (0.201-0.510); however, there were insufficient data for laser alone therapy comparison. The laser combination therapy had a greater pain improvement rate, 0.580 (0.389-0.750) versus 0.420 (0.224-0.645), compared to laser alone therapy, and a greater degree of good or excellent (> 50%) improvement in the overall scar, 0.636 (95%CI 0.347-0.852) versus 0.149 (95%CI 0.032-0.482), with laser alone therapy. Moreover, a lower regrowth rate of 0.187 (0.129-0.263) versus 0.249 (0.060-0.631), a lower post-treatment pigmentation rate of 0.125 (0.091-0.169) versus 0.135 (0.058-0.282), and a lower infection rate of 0.047 (0.009-0.209) versus 0.076 (0.012-0.351) were observed in the laser combination therapy compared with those rates in the laser alone therapy.The overall effect of laser combination therapy was better than that of laser alone therapy, and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower in laser combination therapy than in laser alone therapy.

A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of compound analgesia in ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment of post-burn hypertrophic scars in children / 中华烧伤杂志

Objective: To investigate the effects of compound analgesia on ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser (UFCL) treatment of post-burn hypertrophic s in children. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From April 2018 to March 2020, 169 pediatric patients with post-burn hypertrophic s admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University were randomly divided into general anesthesia alone group (39 cases, 19 males and 20 females, aged 35 (21, 48) months), general anesthesia+lidocaine group (41 cases, 23 males and 18 females, aged 42 (22, 68) months), general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (41 cases, 25 males and 16 females, aged 38 (26, 52) months), and three-drug combination group with general anesthesia + lidocaine+ibuprofen suppository (48 cases, 25 males and 23 females, aged 42 (25, 60) months), and the pediatric patients in each group were treated with corresponding analgesic regimens when UFCL was used to treat s, and the pediatric patients were given comprehensive care throughout the treatment process. The pain degree of pediatric patients scar was evaluated by facial expression,legs,activity,cry,and consolability (FLACC) of children's pain behavior scale at 0 (immediately), 1, 2, and 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, respectively. At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia of postoperative pain assessment, the self-made analgesia satisfaction questionnaire was used to evaluate the satisfaction for the analgesic effect of the pediatric patients or their families, and the satisfaction rate was calculated. Within 2 h after the first operation, the occurrences of adverse reactions of the pediatric patients, such as nausea and vomiting, headache, dizziness, drowsiness, etc, were observed and recorded. Before the first treatment and 1 month after the last treatment, the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) was used to evaluate the pediatric patients scar, and the difference value between the two was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with least significant difference test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact probability test. Results: At 0 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of pediatric patients in general anesthesia+lidocaine group, general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group (P<0.01). The FLACC scores of the pediatric patients in anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01), and the FLACC score of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (P<0.01). At 1 and 2 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of pediatric patients in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were both significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group and general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01), and the FLACC score of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly lower than that in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group (P<0.01). At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the FLACC scores of the pediatric patients in general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group and three-drug combination group were significantly lower than those in general anesthesia alone group and general anesthesia+lidocaine group (P<0.01). At 4 h after awakening from the first anesthesia, the satisfactions rate with the analgesic effect in the four groups of pediatric patients or their families were 79.49% (31/39), 85.37% (35/41), 87.80% (36/41), and 97.92% (47/48), respectively. The satisfaction rate of the pediatric patients in three-drug combination group was significantly higher than those in general anesthesia alone group, general anesthesia+lidocaine group, general anesthesia+ibuprofen suppository group. Within 2 h after the first operation, there was no significant difference in the overall comparison of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, headache, dizziness, and drowsiness of pediatric patients among the 4 groups (P>0.05). The VSS scores of pediatric patients before the first treatment, 1 month after the last treatment, and and the difference value between the two in the 4 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusions: Three-drug combination for analgesia has a good effect in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burn in pediatric patients with UFCL. Pediatric patients or their families are highly satisfied with the effect, and the treatment effect and incidence of adverse reactions are similar to other analgesic regimens, so it is recommended to be promoted in clinical practice.

Evolution of compressive mechanical properties of early hypertrophic scar during laser treatment.

Laser therapy has been widely used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars (HPS), but whether the mechanical properties of HPS tissue after laser treatment can be restored to those of normal skin remains unclear. In this paper, the relationship between the evolution of compressive mechanical properties and histological changes of HPS tissues following three successive combined pulsed dye laser (PDL) and fractional CO2 laser (CO2) treatments was investigated by compression tests and histological analysis. The early HPS model of rabbit ear was established by CO2 laser ablation. The loading-unloading tests and strain creep tests under the compression forces of 1 N, 2 N, and 3 N were carried out for normal skin, untreated HPS and HPS after different treatment times, respectively. The results showed that the compression ratio λ of all tissues revealed force dependence and rose with the increasing compression force, which was similar to the trend of most biological soft tissues. The histological changes of HPSs following laser treatment have a significant influence on the compressive mechanical response. Compared with the normal skin, the toughness and anti-deformation ability of HPS reduced due to the proliferation of collagen fibers and the destruction of elastic fibers, resulting in higher energy dissipation, compression ratio λ, and stable creep rate D, and lower elastic modulus. After three successive combined PDL/ CO2 laser treatments, the compressive mechanical properties and creep properties of HPS gradually approached that of the normal skin owing to the gradual restoration of the amount and distribution of collagen and elastic fibers in HPS. The results provide a new method for evaluating the clinical efficacy of laser therapy for treatment of HPS tissue.

The effectiveness of long Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser alone for treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars versus its combination with bleomycin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pathological scars are benign hyper-proliferative growths of dermal collagen that causes severe psychological and physical problems. This study was performed to assess and compare safety and clinical efficiency of combined pulsed Nd-YAG laser and intralesional bleomycin versus pulsed Nd-YAG laser alone to treat the hypertrophic scars and keloids. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomly, 40 patients with hypertrophic scars or keloids were divided into two groups A and B. Group A were handled by pulsed Nd:YAG laser and intralesional bleomycin while group B were handled by pulsed Nd:YAG laser only. Response was assessed subjectively by clinical imaging and modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS). While for objective evaluation, skin biopsies were taken from volunteer patients before and after treatment, and were examined by Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) and Masson trichrome staining. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated almost complete improvement in 4 (20%) patients, partial improvement in 16 (80%) patients and 0 patient with no improvement in group A. Furthermore, in group B, we demonstrated almost complete improvement in 2 (10%) patients, partial in 14 (70%) patients and no improvement in 4 (20%) patients. Modified Vancouver Scar Scale reduced from 10.15 to 3.5 in group A and from 11.05 to 4.95 in group B. Elastica Masson-Goldner staining and Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that treatment in both groups structurally changed tissue collagen. CONCLUSION: Long-pulsed Nd-YAG laser combined with intralesional bleomycin could be a promising way for treatment of keloids or hypertrophic scars.

[Research advances on the application of pulsed dye laser in the early treatment of post-traumatic scars].

Recent studies have shown that intervention in the early post-traumatic period can inhibit scar hyperplasia and promote scar maturation. Because of its definite therapeutic efficacy and few adverse reactions, it has become an important auxiliary method to prevent scar formation after trauma. This article reviews the research advances on the mechanism of pulsed dye laser in inhibiting the formation of early hypertrophic scar after trauma, the timing of intervention, and its complications and treatment methods, in order to provide a basis for the early prevention and treatment of clinical post-traumatic scars.

[Effect analysis of sequential laser application in treating the hypertrophic scars of burn children at early stage].

Objective: To explore the effects of sequential application of intensive pulsed light and carbon dioxide laser in treating the hypertrophic scars of burn children at early stage. Methods: A retrospective cohort before-after control study in the same patients was conducted. From January 2016 to December 2018, 145 burn children with hypertrophic scar at the early stage who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the First Hospital of Jilin University, including 82 males and 63 females, aged 1 to 12 (3 (2, 6)) years. All the children were firstly treated with intense pulsed light therapy (no anesthesia or intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia) at an interval of once per month, and then changed to carbon dioxide laser therapy (topical anesthesia or intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia) when the degree of scar hyperemia was reduced, at an interval of once every 3 months, for a total of 3 times. Before the first intense pulsed light treatment (hereinafter referred to as before the first treatment) and 3 months after the last carbon dioxide laser treatment (hereinafter referred to as after the last treatment), scar scoring was evaluated by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and scar hyperemia (denoted as hemoglobin level) was measured with Antera 3D® camera. The times of intense pulsed light, the time of single treatment, the anesthesia method, and the time of intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia of intense pulsed light and carbon dioxide laser treatment were analyzed. After the last treatment, Likert Scale was used to evaluate the efficacy satisfaction of both doctors and patients. Adverse reactions were recorded during the treatment. Data were statistically analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and paired sample t test. Results: The color, vascular distribution, thickness, and softness scores, and total score in VSS scoring of scars of children after the last treatment were significantly lower than those before the first treatment (Z=-6.05, -10.34, -9.84, -9.28, -10.43, P<0.01). The hemoglobin level of scar of children after the last treatment was 1.86±0.24, significantly lower than 2.27±0.32 before the first treatment (t=17.65, P<0.01). A total of 411 times of intense pulsed light therapy were performed, (2.8±0.6) times per person, and the single treatment time was 35 (20, 45) s. There were 392 times (95.38%) without anesthesia, and 19 times (4.62%) with intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia with time of 6 (5, 8) min. The single treatment time of carbon dioxide laser therapy was 5 (3, 10) min. There were 364 times (83.68%) of topical anesthesia and 71 times (16.32%) of intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia with time of 10 (8, 15) min. After the last treatment, the efficacy satisfaction scores of doctors and patients were (4.3±0.7) and (3.8±1.0) points, respectively. Blisters occurred in 5 cases after intense pulsed light treatment, which were healed naturally after drainage. One child developed local skin infection, skin redness and swelling accompanied by purulent exudate after carbon dioxide laser treatment, which was improved after skin disinfection and external use of mupirocin ointment. No inflammatory pigmentation, worsening of hyperplasia of scar, erythema, or other skin adverse reactions or anesthetics-related adverse reactions occurred in any child. Conclusions: Sequential application of intense pulsed light and carbon dioxide laser to treat the hypertrophic scars of burn children at early stage can obviously improve the appearance and texture of scar, with higher satisfaction of doctors and patients and fewer adverse reactions.

Hypertrophic Scar Outcomes in Fractional Laser Monotherapy Versus Fractional Laser-Assisted Topical Corticosteroid Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Topical corticosteroid delivery following fractional laser treatment is an effective means of treating hypertrophic scars. However, the relative efficacy of adjuvant corticosteroid treatment vs fractional laser mono-therapy alone is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional laser-assisted topical corticosteroid delivery with fractional laser monotherapy in the treatment of hyper-trophic scars. In this randomized, comparative, split-scar trial of 19 subjects, a borderline significant reduction in scar thickness was observed at 3-month follow-up in the laser+steroid group compared with laser+petrolatum (p = 0.049). However, no significant long-term difference in scar flattening was observed between the 2 groups. Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores showed significant improvement in scar appearance from baseline without significant differences between treatment groups. In conclusion, fractional laser monotherapy is an effective treatment for hypertrophic scars, and the application of topical corticosteroid provides no long-term synergistic effect to fractional laser monotherapy.

Intense pulsed light versus cryotherapy in the treatment of hypertrophic scars: A clinical and histopathological study.

BACKGROUND: Different therapeutic modalities have been tried for hypertrophic scar treatment. To our knowledge, intense pulsed light (IPL) has not been previously evaluated in comparison with cryotherapy as a stand-alone treatment for hypertrophic scars. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IPL as a monotherapy for hypertrophic scar treatment as compared with cryotherapy both clinically and histopathologically. METHODS: This study included 28 patients with hypertrophic scars. Patients were divided randomly and equally into two groups; group I patients received cryotherapy while group II patients received IPL. All patients received treatments for a total of six sessions or until resolution of the lesion whichever was nearer. The outcome was evaluated clinically and histopathologically. RESULTS: Scar height showed a significant decrease and scar color and pliability showed a significant improvement in group I. No significant changes were detected in group II except in scar pliability. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) mean decreased by -53.7% in group I versus -11.5% decrease in group II. Histopathologically, group I showed a significantly increased epidermal thickness and decreased dermal and collagen bundle thickness, while group II showed insignificant histopathological changes. Group I exhibited a statistically significant clinical and histopathological improvement compared to group II, yet with more complications. CONCLUSION: Cryotherapy is more effective than IPL in the treatment of hypertrophic scars both on clinical and histopathological level yet with more complications.

A retrospective study to identify the optimal parameters for pulsed dye laser in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars in Chinese children with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV.

For over several decades, 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) has been used effectively, reducing erythema and improving the pliability and texture of burn scars. Children usually tolerate PDL treatment as it is non-invasive and causes only mild pain compared to other laser treatments. However, currently, there are limited data on scar management in children who underwent PDL treatment, especially for Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV. The objective of the study was to identify the optimal parameters for the PDL treatment that induce inhibitory effects on scar tissue in children with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV. Besides, the study assessed the usefulness of high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz) and laser Doppler flowmetry in assessing these lesions. A total of 165 (79 males and 86 females) children with hypertrophic scars treated by PDL were assessed by the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz), and laser Doppler flowmetry. The parameters used for the 595-nm PDL treatment were pulse duration of 0.45 ms, fluence between 5 and 9 J/cm2, a spot size of 7 mm, and treatment intervals from 3 to 8 weeks. There were no significant differences between pretreatment and post-treatment in terms of the distribution of sex, type of skin color, and low and high fluences. While the mean scores of all scar parameters based on VSS, except thickness and pliability between pre and post-treatment, showed significant differences in ≤3-year-old children vs. to >3-year-old children, except for the subscore, a significant improvement was observed when PDL was initiated within 4 to 6 months of the scar age. In Chinese children with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV, early intervention, appropriate treatment intervals, and low fluence of PDL were optimal parameters in treating hypertrophic burn scars. The combined high-frequency ultrasound and laser Doppler flowmetry assessment of scars helped assess these lesions and compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities.

[A prospective randomized controlled clinical study on the optimal treatment interval of pulsed dye laser in treating hypertrophic scar after burn].

Objective: To observe the influence of different treatment intervals of pulsed dye laser (PDL) in treating hypertrophic scar after burn, and to explore the optimal treatment interval. Methods: From May 2018 to March 2019, 20 burn patients who met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. Patients were divided into 1 week group (4 patients, 2 males and 2 females, aged 27 (4, 67) years, 19 scars), 2 weeks group (5 patients, 2 males and 3 females, aged 9 (3, 55) years, 15 scars), 3 weeks group (5 patients, 4 males and 1 female, aged 26 (19, 45) years, 15 scars), and 4 weeks group (6 patients, 4 males and 2 females, aged 31 (14, 48) years, 13 scars), according to the random number table, and treated with PDL with the treatment intervals of 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks, respectively, with total treatment cycle of 3 months. Before the first treatment and three months after the first treatment, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was conducted and the decreased value of VSS score was calculated; the laser Doppler blood flow meter was used to measure scar blood perfusion and the proportion of change in blood perfusion volume was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Wilcoxon symbolic rank sum test, Bonferroni correction, and Fisher's exact probability test. Results: The VSS scores of patients in 1 week group, 2 weeks group, 3 weeks group, and 4 weeks group in three months after the first treatment were significantly lower than those before the first treatment (Z=-3.74, -3.47, -2.69, -3.25, P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the decreased values of VSS scores in three months after the first treatment among the patients in 4 groups (H=2.35, P>0.05). Three months after the first treatment, the blood perfusion volumes of patients in 2 weeks group and 3 weeks group were significantly lower than those before the first treatment (Z=-2.95, -2.50, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The proportions of changes in blood perfusion volume of patients in 1 week group, 2 weeks group, 3 weeks group, and 4 weeks group were respectively -0.02 (-1.05, 0.69), -0.29 (-0.75, 0.18), -0.11 (-0.55, 0.23), 0.05 (-0.61, 0.75). There were statistically significant differences among the 4 groups (H=9.39, P<0.05). The proportions of changes in blood perfusion volume of patients in 2 weeks group was statistically higher than that of 1 week group (Z=2.76, P<0.01). Conclusions: PDL treatment can reduce the VSS score and blood perfusion volume of scar. One treatment every two weeks or three weeks improve the scar blood perfusion volume more significantly, and can be recommended as the appropriate treatment interval of PDL for hypertrophic scar after burn.

Application of Auriculotherapy for Post-Burn Scar Syndrome in Young Adults with Major Burns.

Background: A burn scar is a type of hypertrophic scar that can cause significant clinical symptoms, discomfort, and post-burn scar (PBS) syndrome in up to 77% of patients with burn injuries. Medication and rehabilitation are rarely effective at managing patient discomfort, and both laser and surgical interventions are postponed until the scar stabilizes and discomfort is tolerable. Objectives: The present study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of auricular acupuncture among burn victims from the Formosa Color Dust Explosion in Taiwan. Methods: We enrolled 31 victims of the 2016 Formosa Color Dust Explosion who met the study inclusion criteria. The intervention involved placement of magnetic beads over the auricular Shenmen and Subcortex acupoints on one ear. Patients performed selfmassage five times per day, and both magnet beads were removed between the fifth and seventh days during the sessions. Several evaluation tools were used to assess clinical symptoms: the visual analogue scale for pain assessment, Burn Man Itch Scale for perceived patient itchiness, 5-D Pruritus Scale for sleep quality, and heart rate variability (HRV) for effects on the autonomic nervous system. Results: The clinical symptoms were significantly decreased following the intervention, but the effect did not endure. The normal-to-normal heart rate interval, heart rate analysis abnormalities, and very low frequency heart rate were significantly decreased among patients with abnormal HRV (SD < 40) following treatment. Conclusion: Stimulation of the auricular Shenmen and Subcortex acupoints may effectively reduce pain, itchiness, and sleep disturbances among patients with PBS syndrome.

Fractional CO2 laser is as effective as pulsed dye laser for the treatment of hypertrophic scars.

BACKGROUND: Both pulsed dye laser (PDL) and fractional CO2 laser (FCO2L) are used commonly for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of PDL and FCO2L on hypertrophic scars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One part of each scar, or one of the two similar scars in 35 patients was treated with PDL and the other parts, or scars were treated with FCO2L. The parameters used for FCO2L were: power = 30 W, pulse energy = 50 mJ, density = 200 spots/cm2. The parameters used for 585 nm PDL were 9 J/cm2 with 5 mm spot size. The FCO2L side was treated for three passes to debulk the scar. The coagulated tissue was wiped out before the next pass. The PDL side was treated with two superimposed passes. The procedures were repeated every month for 4 months. RESULTS: After four sessions of laser therapy, both sides showed remarkable improvement but no meaningful difference was detected between two areas that were treated with PDL and FCO2Ls (p > .05). The mean Vancouver Scar Scale was 7.31 ± 1.93 in the beginning and 4.26 ± 1.48 for FCO2L and 4.33 ± 1.70 for PDL one months after the final session. CONCLUSIONS: Both PDL and FCO2Ls were equally effective on hypertrophic scars.

Fractional Ablative Laser Therapy is an Effective Treatment for Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Prospective Study of Objective and Subjective Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine objective and subjective changes in mature hypertrophic burn scars treated with a fractional ablative carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. BACKGROUND: Fractional CO2 laser treatment has been reported to improve burn scars, with increasing clinical use despite a paucity of controlled, prospective clinical studies using objective measures of improvement. METHODS: A multicenter, site-controlled, prospective open-label study was conducted from 2013 to 2016. Objective and patient-reported outcome measures were documented at baseline, at each monthly laser treatment, and 6 months after treatment. Objective measurements employed were: mechanical skin torque to measure viscoelastic properties; ultrasonic imaging to measure scar thickness; and reflectometry to measure erythema and pigmentation. Subjective measures included health-related quality of life, patient and investigator scar assessment scales, and blinded scoring of before and after photographs. Subjects aged 11 years or older with hypertrophic burn scars were recruited. Each subject received 3 monthly treatment sessions with an ablative fractionated CO2 laser. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects were enrolled, of whom 26 received at least 1 fractional CO2 laser treatment and 22 received 3 treatments. Mean age of those completing all 3 treatments was 28 years. Statistically significant objective improvements in elastic stretch (P < 0.01), elastic recovery (P < 0.01), extensibility (P < 0.01), and thickness (P < 0.01) were noted. Patient- and physician-reported scar appearance and pain/pruritus were significantly improved (P < 0.01). There was no regression of improvement for at least 6 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fractional ablative laser treatment provides significant, sustained improvement of elasticity, thickness, appearance, and symptoms of mature hypertrophic burn scars.